From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daniels v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Mar 4, 2021
312 So. 3d 1029 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 1D20-3157

03-04-2021

Spenser DANIELS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Spenser Daniels, pro se, Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Spenser Daniels, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED . See State v. McBride , 848 So. 2d 287, 290–91 (Fla. 2003) (explaining that collateral estoppel prohibits a defendant from raising the same illegal sentencing claim that has already been raised in a prior postconviction motion and decided against him on the merits).

Appellant is warned that any future filings that this Court determines to be frivolous or malicious may result in the imposition of sanctions, including a prohibition against any further pro se filings in this Court and a referral to the appropriate institution for disciplinary procedures. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2019) (providing that "[a] prisoner who is found by a court to have brought a frivolous or malicious suit, action, claim, proceeding, or appeal ... is subject to disciplinary procedures pursuant to the rules of the Department of Corrections").

Ray, C.J., and Lewis and Jay, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Daniels v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Mar 4, 2021
312 So. 3d 1029 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Daniels v. State

Case Details

Full title:SPENSER DANIELS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Mar 4, 2021

Citations

312 So. 3d 1029 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Citing Cases

Daniels v. State

This Court has previously warned Daniels about filing frivolous claims. See Daniels v. State, 312 So.3d 1029…