From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daniels v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jun 28, 1989
545 So. 2d 504 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. 88-1078.

June 28, 1989.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County; Joseph Q. Tarbuck, Judge.

Jack Behr, Public Defender, and Michael A. Van Cavage, Asst. Public Defender, Pensacola, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and William A. Hatch, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.


Appellant was sentenced as a habitual felony offender, pursuant to Section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1987). However, the factual recitations justifying the enhanced sentence, specifically, that defendant was convicted of separate felonies on August 16, 1984, and December 14, 1983, are not supported by the record. The defendant pleaded nolo contendere and was convicted of lesser misdemeanor offenses. Therefore, we reverse and remand.

We observe, however, that appellant was convicted of a felony on December 2, 1982 — a period of time within five years of the commission of the instant offense. Whether the trial judge would still reach the same conclusion that defendant should be declared a habitual felony offender is impossible to determine from the record.

Accordingly, the sentence is REVERSED and the cause REMANDED for resentencing.

ERVIN, SHIVERS and JOANOS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Daniels v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jun 28, 1989
545 So. 2d 504 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

Daniels v. State

Case Details

Full title:PAUL DANIELS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jun 28, 1989

Citations

545 So. 2d 504 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Citing Cases

Daniels v. State

Appellant appealed to this court, which reversed the sentence and remanded for resentencing because "the…