From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daniels v. Sproul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ALBANY DIVISION
Jun 29, 2012
CASE NO.: 1:12-CV-004 (WLS) (M.D. Ga. Jun. 29, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO.: 1:12-CV-004 (WLS)

06-29-2012

RICHARD DANIELS, Plaintiff, v. KEVIN SPROUL, et al., Respondent.


ORDER

Before the Court is a Recommendation from United States Magistrate Judge Thomas Q. Langstaff, filed February 21, 2012. (Doc. 11). It is recommended that any claims against Defendants Parks, Hagger, Kendrick, Lewis, Sproul, and Montegard be dismissed without prejudice, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), for failure to state a claim.

The Recommendation provided the Parties with fourteen (14) days to file written objections to the recommendations therein. (Id.) The period for objections expired on Tuesday, March 6, 2012; no objections have been filed to date. (See Docket).

Upon full review and consideration upon the record, the Court finds that said Recommendation (Doc. 11) should be, and hereby is, ACCEPTED, ADOPTED and made the Order of this Court for reason of the findings made and reasons stated therein. Accordingly, all claims against Defendants Parks, Hagger, Kendrick, Lewis, Sproul, and Montegard are DISMISSED without prejudice, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff may go forward with his Eighth Amendment claims against Defendants Milton Davis, Rajshaun Bridges, and Corporal Adams.

________________

THE HONORABLE W. LOUIS SANDS ,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Daniels v. Sproul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ALBANY DIVISION
Jun 29, 2012
CASE NO.: 1:12-CV-004 (WLS) (M.D. Ga. Jun. 29, 2012)
Case details for

Daniels v. Sproul

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD DANIELS, Plaintiff, v. KEVIN SPROUL, et al., Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ALBANY DIVISION

Date published: Jun 29, 2012

Citations

CASE NO.: 1:12-CV-004 (WLS) (M.D. Ga. Jun. 29, 2012)