Opinion
05-22-00873-CV
12-13-2022
On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-22-05096
Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Molberg, and Justice Goldstein
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROBERT D. BURNS, III, CHIEF JUSTICE
We questioned our jurisdiction over this appeal from the trial court's August 18, 2022 dismissal order as it did not appear the order disposed of all parties and claims or that the order was otherwise appealable. See Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. Tipps, 842 S.W.2d 266, 272 (Tex. 1992) (appeal may only be taken from final judgments that dispose of all parties and claims or interlocutory orders authorized by statute). As reflected in the record, appellant filed the underlying suit against Katina Snow, Child Support Agency, AtWork Group, Nancy Delgado, Jazmine Wells Castillo, Maritza De Jesus, Maria Carrillo, Amanda Alvey, and KR Young Staffing TX557. The appealed order dismissed the claims against KR Young Staffing, AtWork Group, Delgado, Castillo, De Jesus, Carrillo, and Alvey by granting their Rule 91a motion, see Tex. R. Civ. P. 91a (concerning baseless causes of action), but did not address the claims against Snow and the Child Support Agency. Although we directed appellant to file a letter brief addressing our concern and cautioned appellant that failure to comply could result in the appeal being dismissed, see Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a),(c), more than ten days have passed and appellant has not complied. Accordingly, on the record before us, we dismiss the appeal. See id. 42.3(a); see also Koenig v. Blaylock, 497 S.W.3d 595, 598 n.4 (Tex. App.-Austin 2016, pet. denied) (noting no statute authorizes interlocutory appeal from order denying Rule 91a motion).
JUDGMENT
In accordance with this Court's opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.
Judgment entered December 13, 2022.