From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daniels v. Sherman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - WESTERN DIVISION
Jun 29, 2016
NO. CV 15-1477-SVW (AS) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 29, 2016)

Opinion

NO. CV 15-1477-SVW (AS)

06-29-2016

BRANDON DANIELS, Petitioner, v. STU SHERMAN, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the records herein and the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. After having made a de novo determination of the portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections were directed, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying and dismissing the Petition with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and the Judgment herein on counsel for Petitioner and counsel for Respondent.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

DATED: June 29, 2016.

/s/_________

STEPHEN V. WILSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Daniels v. Sherman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - WESTERN DIVISION
Jun 29, 2016
NO. CV 15-1477-SVW (AS) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 29, 2016)
Case details for

Daniels v. Sherman

Case Details

Full title:BRANDON DANIELS, Petitioner, v. STU SHERMAN, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 29, 2016

Citations

NO. CV 15-1477-SVW (AS) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 29, 2016)