From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daniels v. Salzaar

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION
Jun 5, 2018
Case No. 4:16-cv-00291 KGB (E.D. Ark. Jun. 5, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 4:16-cv-00291 KGB

06-05-2018

BYRON K. DANIELS PLAINTIFF v. MCCORMACK BARON SALZAAR, et al. DEFENDANTS


JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the Order entered on this date, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged that plaintiff Byron K. Daniels' operative complaint is dismissed. The Court dismisses without prejudice Mr. Daniels' claims against separate defendants Baron Salazar, Inc., d/b/a The Oaks Apartment ("McCormack"), and Catricia Marks. The Court dismisses with prejudice Mr. Daniels' claims pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ("Title VII"), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act ("ADEA"), 29 U.S.C. § 623(d), against separate defendants Pauline Olden and Mary Long in their individual capacities. The Court dismisses without prejudice Mr. Daniels' remaining claims against Ms. Olden and Ms. Long. The relief sought is denied.

So adjudged this 5th day of June, 2018.

/s/_________

Kristine G. Baker

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Daniels v. Salzaar

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION
Jun 5, 2018
Case No. 4:16-cv-00291 KGB (E.D. Ark. Jun. 5, 2018)
Case details for

Daniels v. Salzaar

Case Details

Full title:BYRON K. DANIELS PLAINTIFF v. MCCORMACK BARON SALZAAR, et al. DEFENDANTS

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 5, 2018

Citations

Case No. 4:16-cv-00291 KGB (E.D. Ark. Jun. 5, 2018)