From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daniels v. McDaniel

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Sep 15, 2010
Case No. 3:10-CV-00315-LRH-(VPC) (D. Nev. Sep. 15, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 3:10-CV-00315-LRH-(VPC).

September 15, 2010


ORDER


The court ordered petitioner to show cause why this action should not be dismissed because petitioner had not exhausted his available remedies in the state courts before filing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (#4). Order (#3). Petitioner has not complied with the court's order (#3) within the allotted time.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice for petitioner's failure to exhaust his available state-court remedies. The clerk of the court shall enter judgment accordingly.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's motion for the appointment of counsel (#5) is DENIED as moot.

DATED this 15th day of September, 2010.


Summaries of

Daniels v. McDaniel

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Sep 15, 2010
Case No. 3:10-CV-00315-LRH-(VPC) (D. Nev. Sep. 15, 2010)
Case details for

Daniels v. McDaniel

Case Details

Full title:ALLAN MICAH DANIELS, Petitioner, v. E. K. McDANIEL, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Sep 15, 2010

Citations

Case No. 3:10-CV-00315-LRH-(VPC) (D. Nev. Sep. 15, 2010)