Daniels v. Kaiser

3 Citing cases

  1. Gamble v. Calbone

    375 F.3d 1021 (10th Cir. 2004)   Cited 35 times
    Holding that "no evidence support[ed] a finding" that prisoners attempted to obtain money for an improper purpose because there was no suggestion that they acted with fraudulent intent, an element of the charge

    The legislature also concurrently amended section 549 to specifically provide an inmate the right to use mandatory savings during incarceration to pay "for any fees or court costs incurred by an inmate filing any civil action." Daniels v. Kaiser, 851 P.2d 529, 531 (Okla. 1993) (quoting the November 1, 1985 amendment); see also Foust v. Pearman, 850 P.2d 1047, 1051 (Okla. 1992) (Hodges, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part) ("Two days after the Cumbey decision, the Legislature amended title 57 to conform to that holding.") The legislature amended section 549 again in 1990 to limit " any fees or court costs" to those "as defined in Section 151 of Title 28 of the Oklahoma Statutes."

  2. City of Okla. v. Balkman

    2020 OK 104 (Okla. 2020)

    Woody v. State ex rel. Dept. of Corrections, 1992 OK 45, 833 P.2d 257.Daniels v. Kaiser, 1993 OK 51, 851 P.2d 529. 16. review of actions of officials alleged to have denied federally-protected liberty interests;

  3. Martin v. Jordan

    2006 OK 26 (Okla. 2006)   Cited 1 times

    57 O.S.Supp. 2004 § 549[ 57-549]. See also Daniels v. Kaiser, 1993 OK 51, 851 P.2d 529, 531. The deposit for costs in this Court is Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00) and is required by 20 O.S.Supp. 2004 § 15[ 20-15].