Daniels v. Jenkins

3 Citing cases

  1. SEYMOUR v. ESTATE OF LEAH KARP PAC. IN.

    No. 2005-CA-1382 Consolidated with: No. 2005-CA-1383 (La. Ct. App. Aug. 7, 2008)

    Specifically, the Court concludes that the evidence that demonstrates that the car driven by Mrs. Karp was furnished or available for her regular use while residing temporarily with her parents. The Court cites Daniels versus Jenkins, 709 So.2d 362 . . . We agree:

  2. Seymour v. Estate of Karp

    996 So. 2d 1 (La. Ct. App. 2008)   Cited 7 times

    Specifically, the Court concludes that the evidence that demonstrates that the car driven by Mrs. Karp was furnished or available for her regular use while residing temporarily with her parents. The Court cites Daniels versus Jenkins, 709 So.2d 362 . . .

  3. Francioni v. Hartford Cas. Ins. Co.

    CIVIL ACTION 15-528-SDD-EWD (M.D. La. Mar. 15, 2017)

    522 So.2d 690 (La. App. 5th Cir. 1988). 98-0285 (La. App. 4 Cir. 3/25/98); 709 So.2d 362. Chon, 522 So.2d at 692 (emphasis in original).