From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daniels v. Hatton

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 7, 2022
2:16-cv-3025 MCE AC P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 7, 2022)

Opinion

2:16-cv-3025 MCE AC P

11-07-2022

TOMMY GENE DANIELS, Petitioner, v. SHAWN HATTON, Respondent.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding through counsel, has filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. ECF No. 36. Examination of the in forma pauperis application reveals that petitioner is unable to afford the costs of suit. Accordingly, the application to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a); Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(1).

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (ECF No. 36) is GRANTED.


Summaries of

Daniels v. Hatton

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 7, 2022
2:16-cv-3025 MCE AC P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 7, 2022)
Case details for

Daniels v. Hatton

Case Details

Full title:TOMMY GENE DANIELS, Petitioner, v. SHAWN HATTON, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 7, 2022

Citations

2:16-cv-3025 MCE AC P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 7, 2022)