From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daniels v. Daniels

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 2, 1997
243 A.D.2d 254 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

October 2, 1997

Appeal from Supreme Court, New York County (Lewis Friedman, J.).


The trial court's award of durational maintenance was a proper exercise of discretion in view of the short, 10-month duration of the marriage (Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [6] [a] [2]), and the fact that defendant, who retired from her career in real estate in about October 1990, which was approximately 2 months prior to the marriage, is employable (Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [6] [a] [3], [4]; cf., Pejo v. Pejo, 213 A.D.2d 918, lv denied 85 N.Y.2d 811; Guttman v. Guttman, 159 A.D.2d 431, lv denied 76 N.Y.2d 703). There is no support in the record for defendant's claims that she gave up her career at plaintiff's insistence, or that there was an oral prenuptial agreement, which would be unenforceable in any event (Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [3]; General Obligations Law § 5-701 [a] [3]). The record also supports the finding of voluntary support payments made by plaintiff to defendant after the date of defendant's first motion for support in 1992, for which plaintiff was properly given a credit ( see, Kaplan v. Kaplan, 192 A.D.2d 343, 344), as well as the denial of defendant's request for additional counsel fees ( see, De Bernardo v. De Bernardo, 180 A.D.2d 500, 502). Denial of defendant's motion to serve a 67-page amended answer made 16 months after joinder of issue was a proper exercise of discretion where there had already been considerable delay largely attributable to defendant and significant prejudice to plaintiff would have resulted ( see, Felix v. Lettre, 204 A.D.2d 679). We have considered defendant's other claims and find them to be without merit.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied; and insofar as it seeks reargument, the motion is granted to the extent of recalling and vacating the unpublished decision and order of this Court (Appeal No. 60983) entered on June 5, 1997, and substituting therefor a new decision and order, decided simultaneously herewith.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Ellerin, Tom, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.


Summaries of

Daniels v. Daniels

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 2, 1997
243 A.D.2d 254 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Daniels v. Daniels

Case Details

Full title:DERICK J. DANIELS, Respondent, v. BARBARA K. DANIELS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 2, 1997

Citations

243 A.D.2d 254 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
663 N.Y.S.2d 141

Citing Cases

Hearst v. Hearst

However, since there is no equitable distribution here, the husband is not entitled to reimbursement from the…

Gordon v. Gordon

Retroactive sums due by reason of this award shall be paid at the rate of $100 per week in addition to the…