From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daniels v. City of Pittsburgh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 19, 2013
Civil Action No. 12-1631 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 19, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-1631

03-19-2013

HARVEY W. DANIELS, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH, et al., Defendants.


Judge Cathy Bissoon

Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly


MEMORANDUM ORDER

This case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(l)(A) and (B), and Rules 72.C and 72.D of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

On February 20, 2013, the magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation recommending that the complaint filed by Plaintiff (Doc. 1) be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff was given until March 11, 2013, to file objections to the report. As of the date of this writing, no objections have been filed, nor has Plaintiff moved for an extension of time in which to do so. After de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the report and recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 19th day of March, 2013,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report of February 20, 2013, (Doc. 12) is converted to a memorandum order and constitutes the opinion of this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the complaint filed by Plaintiff is dismissed (Doc. 1).

______________________

Cathy Bissoon

United States District Judge
cc: All attorneys of record (via CM/ECF e-mail).


Summaries of

Daniels v. City of Pittsburgh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 19, 2013
Civil Action No. 12-1631 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 19, 2013)
Case details for

Daniels v. City of Pittsburgh

Case Details

Full title:HARVEY W. DANIELS, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Mar 19, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-1631 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 19, 2013)