From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daniell v. Astrue

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Mar 25, 2011
Case No. C11-5227 JRC (W.D. Wash. Mar. 25, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. C11-5227 JRC.

March 25, 2011


ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS


Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 1) is GRANTED. Plaintiff does not appear to have funds available to afford the $350.00 filing fee.

The Clerk of Court is directed to issue summonses submitted by plaintiff to enable proper service of the complaint on the appropriate parties. It is the responsibility of plaintiff and plaintiff's attorney to properly serve copies of the complaint along with appropriate summonses as required by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.


Summaries of

Daniell v. Astrue

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Mar 25, 2011
Case No. C11-5227 JRC (W.D. Wash. Mar. 25, 2011)
Case details for

Daniell v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:DAVID A. DANIELL, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of the…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma

Date published: Mar 25, 2011

Citations

Case No. C11-5227 JRC (W.D. Wash. Mar. 25, 2011)