From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daniel v. U.S. Department of Justice

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 25, 2011
Case No. 3:09-cv-95-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Mar. 25, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 3:09-cv-95-KRG-KAP.

March 25, 2011


MEMORANDUM ORDER


The plaintiff's motion for reconsideration, docket no. 42, was referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(3). The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation on March 2, 2011, docket no. 43, recommending that the motion be denied. The plaintiff was notified pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), that he had fourteen days to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff has not filed objections and the time to do so has expired.

Upon review of the record of this matter, the Report and Recommendation, and noting the lack of timely objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 25th day of March, 2011, it is

ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for reconsideration, docket no. 42, is denied. The Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court.


Summaries of

Daniel v. U.S. Department of Justice

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 25, 2011
Case No. 3:09-cv-95-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Mar. 25, 2011)
Case details for

Daniel v. U.S. Department of Justice

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM T. DANIEL, Plaintiff v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, et…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 25, 2011

Citations

Case No. 3:09-cv-95-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Mar. 25, 2011)

Citing Cases

Ralston v. Beard

This is the fourth sexual assault civil complaint I have dealt with alleging sexual assault by a prison…