From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daniel v. Ormand

Supreme Court of Alabama
Oct 10, 1935
163 So. 362 (Ala. 1935)

Opinion

6 Div. 806.

June 27, 1935. Rehearing Denied October 10, 1935.

Certiorari to Court of Appeals.

M. B. Grace, of Birmingham, for petitioner.

Taylor Higgins, of Birmingham, for respondent.


The record shows, after demurrer was overruled to some of the special pleas, issue was joined on the plea of the general issue and other special pleas.

At the conclusion of the evidence the court gave the affirmative charge for the defendant.

The appeal to the Court of Appeals was prosecuted to that court on the record proper, without a bill of exceptions. It appears that the Court of Appeals has correctly disposed of the case. See Black v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel Iron Co., 202 Ala. 506, 80 So. 794; Cross v. Esslinger, 133 Ala. 409, 32 So. 10; Street v. Treadwell et al., 203 Ala. 68, 70, 82 So. 28; Thomas v. McArdle, 207 Ala. 521, 93 So. 395.

The writ of certiorari is therefore denied.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and THOMAS and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Daniel v. Ormand

Supreme Court of Alabama
Oct 10, 1935
163 So. 362 (Ala. 1935)
Case details for

Daniel v. Ormand

Case Details

Full title:Russ DANIEL v. Julius ORMAND

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Oct 10, 1935

Citations

163 So. 362 (Ala. 1935)
163 So. 362

Citing Cases

Daniel v. Ormand

Affirmed. Certiorari denied by Supreme Court in Daniel v. Ormand (6 Div. 806) 163 So. 362. M. B. Grace, of…