From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daniel v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Apr 24, 2013
2013-3040 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 24, 2013)

Opinion

2013-3040

04-24-2013

PATRICIA W. DANIEL, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent.


NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. AT0752110374-I-2.

ON MOTION


ORDER

The Department of the Army moves without opposition to reform the official caption to designate the Merit Systems Protection Board ("Board") as the respondent.

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(2), the Board is designated as the respondent when the Board's decision concerns the procedure or jurisdiction of the Board. In this case, the Board dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Thus, the Board is the proper respondent in this petition for review.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The Department of the Army's motion to reform the caption is granted. The revised official caption is reflected above.

(2) The respondent should calculate its brief due date from the date of filing of this order.

FOR THE COURT

____________________

Jan Horbaly

Clerk
s21


Summaries of

Daniel v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Apr 24, 2013
2013-3040 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 24, 2013)
Case details for

Daniel v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

Case Details

Full title:PATRICIA W. DANIEL, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Apr 24, 2013

Citations

2013-3040 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 24, 2013)