Opinion
23-3476
08-02-2024
Unpublished
Submitted: July 15, 2024
Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota
Before KELLY, GRASZ, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Ahmad Daniel appeals the district court's dismissal of his pro se employment discrimination action. After careful review of the record and the parties' arguments on appeal, we conclude that dismissal was warranted based on Daniel's failure to comply with federal and local rules. See Mangan v. Weinberger, 848 F.2d 909, 911 (8th Cir. 1988) (reviewing dismissal for failure to comply with Fed.R.Civ.P. 8 for abuse of discretion); see also Nw. Bank &Tr. Co. v. First Ill. Nat'l Bank, 354 F.3d 721, 725 (8th Cir. 2003) (reviewing district court's application of its local rules for abuse of discretion). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Daniel's pending motion.
The Honorable Eric C. Tostrud, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.