From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daniel v. Five Stars Loyalty, Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California
Aug 7, 2015
3:15-cv-03546 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 7, 2015)

Opinion

          KELLEY DRYE & WARREN LLP, Lauri A. Mazzuchetti (pro hac vice), Edward J. Mullins III (pro hac vice), Parsippany, NJ, KELLEY DRYE & WARREN LLP, Lee S. Brenner, Catherine D. Lee, Los Angeles, CA, Attorneys for Defendant FIVESTARS LOYALTY, INC.

          JAURIGUE LAW GROUP, Michael J. Jaurigue, Abigail A. Zelenski, David Zelenski, GLANCY PRONGAY & MURRAY LLP, Lionel Z. Glancy, Marc L. Godino, Mark S. Greenstone, Attorneys for Plaintiff Sunil Daniel.


          JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (L.R. 6-1)

          JOSEPH C. SPERO, District Judge.

         RECITALS

         WHEREAS, on June 23, 2015, Plaintiff Sunil Daniel ("Plaintiff") filed the initial Class-Action Complaint ("Complaint") against Defendant FiveStars Loyalty, Inc. ("Defendant") (collectively, the "Parties") in the Superior Court of California for the County of San Francisco (the "Action");

         WHEREAS, Plaintiff served Defendant the Complaint on July 14, 2015;

         WHEREAS, on July 31, 2015, Defendant removed the Action to the United States District Court for the Northern District;

         WHEREAS, the deadline for responding to Plaintiff's Complaint is August 7, 2015 pursuant to Rule 81(c)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure;

         WHEREAS, Defendant's counsel asked Plaintiff's counsel for an extension of time as set forth below; and

         WHEREAS, the Parties agree to extend Defendant's time to respond to the Complaint to August 21, 2015.

         STIPULATION

         IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff and Defendant through their respective attorneys of record, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(a), that Defendant's new time to respond to the Complaint is August 21, 2015.

         IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED.

         Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I attest that all other signatories listed, and on whose behalf the filing is submitted, concur in the filing of this stipulation and have authorized the filing of this stipulation.


Summaries of

Daniel v. Five Stars Loyalty, Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California
Aug 7, 2015
3:15-cv-03546 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 7, 2015)
Case details for

Daniel v. Five Stars Loyalty, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:SUNIL DANIEL, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California

Date published: Aug 7, 2015

Citations

3:15-cv-03546 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 7, 2015)