holding that because district court holding would "effectively reverse the state court judgment," the federal claim was "inextricably intertwined" with the state court judgment
Summary of this case from Powell v. PowellNo. 87-2063.
October 3, 1988, October TERM, 1988.
C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 839 F. 2d 263.
holding that because district court holding would "effectively reverse the state court judgment," the federal claim was "inextricably intertwined" with the state court judgment
Summary of this case from Powell v. Powellholding that "[u]nless an employer is shown to control administration of a plan, it is not a proper party defendant in an action concerning benefits"
Summary of this case from Westrich-James v. Dallas Morning News, Inc.pre-empting breach of contract claim
Summary of this case from Vaught v. Hartford Life Accident Insurance Companydiscussing proper party/defendant
Summary of this case from Jorstad v. Connecticut Gen. Life Ins. Co.Full title:DANIEL v. EATON CORP. ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Oct 3, 1988
These types of claims are preempted if they "relate to" an ERISA plan whether or not they were so designed or…
White v. Judicial Inquiry and Review Bd. of Pa.Extensive exposition of specific facts is unnecessary if the district court is only being asked to review a…