From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daniel Gale Associates, Inc. v. Fiance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 18, 1996
225 A.D.2d 652 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

March 18, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Schmidt, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

We reject the appellants' contention that the jury's verdict was inconsistent. The first question posed to the jury was whether the plaintiff had earned a real estate commission for the sale of the property that is the subject of this appeal. The jury answered that question affirmatively, and in response to the remaining question, the jury determined the amount of the commission. There is no inconsistency in the jury's answers to the questions that were posed to it.

We have considered the appellants' remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Miller, J.P., Joy, Hart and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Daniel Gale Associates, Inc. v. Fiance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 18, 1996
225 A.D.2d 652 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Daniel Gale Associates, Inc. v. Fiance

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL GALE ASSOCIATES, INC., Respondent, v. EDWARD FIANCE et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 18, 1996

Citations

225 A.D.2d 652 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
639 N.Y.S.2d 937

Citing Cases

Goldman v. Hickory House Tenants Corp.

Contrary to the appellant's contentions, the jury's verdict is not inconsistent or against the weight of the…