From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Danek v. Hommer

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jun 14, 1954
15 N.J. 573 (N.J. 1954)

Opinion

Argued June 7, 1954 —

Decided June 14, 1954.

On appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Mr. Robert Shaw argued the cause for the appellant ( Messrs. Shaw, Hughes Pindar, attorneys).

Mr. Joseph Weintraub argued the cause for the respondents ( Messrs. McGlynn, Weintraub Stein, attorneys).


The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Francis in the court below.

HEHER, J., concurring in result.

For affirmance — Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices HEHER, OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD, BURLING, JACOBS and BRENNAN — 7.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Danek v. Hommer

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jun 14, 1954
15 N.J. 573 (N.J. 1954)
Case details for

Danek v. Hommer

Case Details

Full title:JOHN DANEK, PLAINTIFF, v. JULIUS J. HOMMER AND KATHERYN HOMMER, PARTNERS…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Jun 14, 1954

Citations

15 N.J. 573 (N.J. 1954)
105 A.2d 677

Citing Cases

Salem Group v. Oliver

As to the duty to defend, the well-settled principle is that an insurer's duty to defend an action against…

Rodriguez v. Shelbourne Spring, LLC

An insurer's duty to defend is broader than its duty to indemnify. Danek v. Hommer, 28 N.J.Super. 68, 79…