Dandridge v. United States

4 Citing cases

  1. Dandridge v. United States

    356 U.S. 259 (1958)   Cited 9 times

    Upon consideration of record and confession of error by Solicitor General, judgment of Court of Appeals reversed and case remanded to District Court with directions to permit defendant to change his plea of guilty. 101 U.S.App.D.C. 114, 247 F.2d 105, reversed. Bernard Dunau and Anastasia Thannhauser Dunau for petitioner.

  2. Dandridge v. United States

    265 F.2d 349 (D.C. Cir. 1959)   Cited 13 times

    Thereupon the District Court, pursuant to mandate, vacated the plea of guilty. Dandridge v. United States, 101 U.S. App.D.C. 114, 247 F.2d 105 (1957). Dandridge v. United States, 356 U.S. 259, 78 S.Ct. 714, 2 L.Ed.2d 757 (1958).

  3. Poole v. United States

    250 F.2d 396 (D.C. Cir. 1957)   Cited 68 times
    In Poole v. United States, 102 U.S.App.D.C. 71, 75, 250 F.2d 396, 400 (1957), we stated that "[l]eave to withdraw a guilty plea prior to sentencing should be freely allowed."

    See Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(d); Note, 64 Yale L.J. 590 (1955); Comment, 22 U. of Chi.L.Rev. 730 (1955); Note, 55 Colum.L.Rev. 366 (1955). Cf. Dandridge v. United States, 101 U.S.App.D.C. ___, 247 F.2d 105, certiorari granted 78 S.Ct. 125; United States v. Panebianco, 2 Cir., 1953, 208 F.2d 238, certiorari denied 1954, 347 U.S. 913, 74 S.Ct. 478, 98 L. Ed. 1069. "If you find any facts that indicate he isn't guilty, file a formal motion."

  4. Sullivan v. United States

    205 F. Supp. 545 (S.D.N.Y. 1962)   Cited 6 times

    Memorandum For The United States p. 16, Dusky v. United States, supra. Cf. Dandridge v. United States, 356 U.S. 259, 78 S.Ct. 714, 2 L.Ed.2d 757 (1958) (Per Curiam), reversing 101 U.S.App.D.C. 157, 247 F.2d 105 (1957), in which the Supreme Court reversed a conviction where the trial court had denied a motion by a defendant to withdraw his plea of guilty. The Government confessed error in the failure at a hearing on the motion to adequately determine whether at the time of the plea petitioner had been suffering from a disabling illness; rather than adopting the Government's suggestion that a new hearing be had, the Court ordered that petitioner be permitted to withdraw his plea. See Brief For The United States, Dandridge v. United States, supra.