From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dandar v. Krysevig

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 5, 2010
Civil Action No. 08-60 Erie (W.D. Pa. Feb. 5, 2010)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 08-60 Erie.

February 5, 2010


MEMORANDUM ORDER


This petition for writ of habeas corpus was received by the Clerk of Court on February 25, 2008 and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, filed on January 5, 2010 [114], recommends that the following motions filed by the Petitioner be denied:

1. "Motion for Declaratory Relief" [73];
2. "Motion for Declaratory Relief-Injunctive-TRO Relief" [77];
3. "Motion for Declaratory Judgment — TRO" [78];
4. "Motion for TRO-Declaratory-Injunctive Relief" [80];
5. "Motion for "Declaratory Relief" [94];
6. "Motion for Declaratory Judgment" [102];
7. "Motion for Declaratory Relief" [103];
8. "Motion for Declaratory Relief" [104];
9. "Motion for Declaratory Relief" [105]; and
10. "Motion for Declaratory Judgment" [106].

The parties were granted ten (10) days in which to file objections. Petitioner filed his objections [118] on January 28, 2010.

After de novo review of the petition and documents in the case, together with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and Petitioner's objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 5th day of February, 2010;

IT IS ORDERED that the Plaintiff's "Motion for Declaratory Relief" [73], "Motion for Declaratory Relief-Injunctive-TRO Relief" [77], "Motion for Declaratory Judgment — TRO" [78], "Motion for TRO-Declaratory-Injunctive Relief" [80], "Motion for "Declaratory Relief" [94], "Motion for Declaratory Judgment" [102], "Motion for Declaratory Relief" [103], "Motion for Declaratory Relief" [104], "Motion for Declaratory Relief" [105], and "Motion for Declaratory Judgment" [106] be, and hereby are, DENIED.

The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter dated January 5, 2010 [114] is adopted as the opinion of the Court.


Summaries of

Dandar v. Krysevig

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 5, 2010
Civil Action No. 08-60 Erie (W.D. Pa. Feb. 5, 2010)
Case details for

Dandar v. Krysevig

Case Details

Full title:RONALD G. DANDAR, Petitioner, v. MARK KRYSEVIG et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Feb 5, 2010

Citations

Civil Action No. 08-60 Erie (W.D. Pa. Feb. 5, 2010)