From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Danco Laboratories v. Chemical Works

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 8, 1998
256 A.D.2d 62 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

December 8, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Ramos, J.)


The motion to intervene is granted only to the extent of remanding this matter to the trial court for an expedited de novo determination, upon written submissions, and the issuance of a written decision which shall detail the grounds underlying any finding of "good cause" in accordance with the provisions of Uniform Rules for Trial Courts (22 N.Y.CRR) § 216.1.

Concur — Lerner, P. J., Ellerin, Andrias, and Saxe, JJ.


Summaries of

Danco Laboratories v. Chemical Works

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 8, 1998
256 A.D.2d 62 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Danco Laboratories v. Chemical Works

Case Details

Full title:DANCO LABORATORIES, LIMITED, Respondent, v. CHEMICAL WORKS OF GEDEON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 8, 1998

Citations

256 A.D.2d 62 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
681 N.Y.S.2d 751

Citing Cases

Law Office of Angela Barker, LLC v. Broxton

In the instant case, Civil Court failed to specify in detail the grounds underlying any finding of "good…

In Matter of Astor

See Matter of Crain Communications, Inc. v. Hughes, 74 NY2d 626, 628 (1989); Coopersmith, supra. Although the…