From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Danam v. Kelley

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Dec 11, 2020
No. 82036 (Nev. Dec. 11, 2020)

Opinion

No. 82036

12-11-2020

RAFAEL CEZAR DANAM, Petitioner, v. ELAINE KELLEY, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PRINCIPAL ALIANTE SOMERSET CHARTER, Respondent.


ORDER DENYING PETITION

This is an original pro se "Petition for Extraordinary Writ for U.S. Constitution Violation from U.S. District Court of Nevada." Having considered the petition, we are not persuaded that writ relief is warranted because petitioner has a plain, speedy, and adequate remedy available to him either by way of filing a civil complaint in the Eighth Judicial District Court, or an appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to the extent he seeks to challenge the dismissal of his federal complaint. See NRS 34.170; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 224, 88 P.3d 840, 841 (2004) (writ relief is proper only when there is no plain, speedy, and adequate remedy at law and petitioner bears the burden of demonstrating that writ relief is warranted). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

Petitioner's December 4, 2020, motion for summary judgment is denied.

/s/_________, C.J.

Pickering /s/_________, J.
Hardesty /s/_________, J.
Silver cc: Rafael Cezar Danam

Law Office of Gary P. Sinkeldam APC


Summaries of

Danam v. Kelley

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Dec 11, 2020
No. 82036 (Nev. Dec. 11, 2020)
Case details for

Danam v. Kelley

Case Details

Full title:RAFAEL CEZAR DANAM, Petitioner, v. ELAINE KELLEY, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Dec 11, 2020

Citations

No. 82036 (Nev. Dec. 11, 2020)