Danaha v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

Full title: BRIAN C. DANAHA, Petitioner v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: May 7, 2018

2017-2309 (Fed. Cir. May. 7, 2018)

Opinion

2017-2309

05-07-2018

BRIAN C. DANAHA, Petitioner v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent

NORMAN JACKMAN, Jackman & Roth, LLP, Lincoln, NH, argued for petitioner. SARA B. REARDEN, Office of the General Counsel, Merit Systems Protection Board, Washington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by KATHERINE M. SMITH.

PER CURIAM

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. CH-0841-17-0199-I-1.

JUDGMENT

NORMAN JACKMAN, Jackman & Roth, LLP, Lincoln, NH, argued for petitioner. SARA B. REARDEN, Office of the General Counsel, Merit Systems Protection Board, Washington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by KATHERINE M. SMITH. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (REYNA, LINN, and CHEN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT May 7, 2018

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court