From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dana v. Von Pichl

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 15, 1972
39 A.D.2d 744 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)

Opinion

May 15, 1972


In a negligence action to recover damages for personal and property injuries, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered August 26, 1971, in his favor upon a jury verdict of only $100. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial granted on all issues, with costs to abide the event. The questions of fact have not been considered. In our opinion, it was error for the trial court to exclude hospital records, including X rays, and limit the scope of plaintiff's testimony because defendants lacked a comprehensive medical file. Defendants had not acquired a complete medical history of plaintiff because of their failure to follow the procedure for physical examinations and the exchange of medical information (22 NYCRR Part 672). The pertinent portions of the hospital records, moreover, were admissible without resort to independent testimony, as business records (CPLR 4518). Hopkins, Acting P.J., Munder, Martuscello and Latham, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dana v. Von Pichl

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 15, 1972
39 A.D.2d 744 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)
Case details for

Dana v. Von Pichl

Case Details

Full title:JAMES F. DANA, Appellant, v. FREDERICK VON PICHL et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 15, 1972

Citations

39 A.D.2d 744 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)

Citing Cases

State v. Torres

Hospital records, including x-rays made and kept in the regular course of the hospital's business, have been…

Hoffman v. City of New York

Thus, where, as here, plaintiff asserts that the X rays are part of his hospital records which are otherwise…