From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dana Innovations v. Rogol

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Feb 2, 2015
SA CV 14-0685-DOC (RNBx) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2015)

Opinion


DANA INNOVATIONS v. ALEX ROGOL, ET AL No. SA CV 14-0685-DOC (RNBx) United States District Court, C.D. California February 2, 2015

          ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

          Honorable David O. Carter, United States District Judge.

         Proceedings : (IN CHAMBERS)

         It is the responsibility of plaintiff to respond promptly to all Orders and to prosecute the action diligently, including filing proofs of service and stipulations extending time to respond. If necessary, plaintiff(s) must also pursue Rule 55 remedies promptly upon default of any defendant. All stipulations affecting the progress of the case must be approved by the Court, Local Rule 7-1.

         The file in this case lacks the papers that would show it is being timely prosecuted, as reflected below. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff (s) to show cause in writing no later than February 9, 2015, why this action should not be dismissed as to all remaining defendants for lack of prosecution.

         As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will accept one of the following, if it is filed on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently.

o Defendant's Answer to Complaint or Plaintiff's Request for Entry of Default

         No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due.

         Plaintiff is to serve notice of this Order on all parties who have not yet appeared in this action.


Summaries of

Dana Innovations v. Rogol

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Feb 2, 2015
SA CV 14-0685-DOC (RNBx) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2015)
Case details for

Dana Innovations v. Rogol

Case Details

Full title:DANA INNOVATIONS v. ALEX ROGOL, ET AL

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Feb 2, 2015

Citations

SA CV 14-0685-DOC (RNBx) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2015)