From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dana Holding Corp. v. Workers' Comp. Appeal Bd.

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
May 14, 2019
208 A.3d 461 (Pa. 2019)

Opinion

No. 729 MAL 2018

05-14-2019

DANA HOLDING CORPORATION, Petitioner v. WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (SMUCK), Respondent


ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 14th day of May, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issues set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issues, as stated by Petitioner, are:

1. Whether the Commonwealth Court erred in applying the [Protz II] standard to the case on appeal at the time of this Court's decision retroactive to the date of the IRE instead of as of the date of the Supreme Court changed in the law?
2. Whether the Commonwealth Court's failure to grant the employer credit for the three year period between the date of the IRE evaluation and the date of this Court's decision in [Protz II] unlawfully violates Employer's constitutional right pursuant to the "Due Course of Law" provisions of the Pennsylvania Constitution Article I, Section 11?


Summaries of

Dana Holding Corp. v. Workers' Comp. Appeal Bd.

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
May 14, 2019
208 A.3d 461 (Pa. 2019)
Case details for

Dana Holding Corp. v. Workers' Comp. Appeal Bd.

Case Details

Full title:DANA HOLDING CORPORATION, Petitioner v. WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

Date published: May 14, 2019

Citations

208 A.3d 461 (Pa. 2019)