From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dan Nguyen v. Attorney Gen.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 21, 2012
No. 3:12-CV-177 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 21, 2012)

Opinion

No. 3:12-CV-177

08-21-2012

DAN NGUYEN, Petitioner, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al., Respondents


(JUDGE CAPUTO)


(MAGISTRATE JUDGE CARLSON)


ORDER

NOW this 21st day of August 2012, upon review of Magistrate Judge Carlson's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 16) for plain error or manifest injustice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

(1) The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 16) is ADOPTED.
(2) The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED AS MOOT.
(3) The Clerk of Court is ordered to mark this matter as CLOSED.

______________

A. Richard Caputo

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Dan Nguyen v. Attorney Gen.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 21, 2012
No. 3:12-CV-177 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 21, 2012)
Case details for

Dan Nguyen v. Attorney Gen.

Case Details

Full title:DAN NGUYEN, Petitioner, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al., Respondents

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Aug 21, 2012

Citations

No. 3:12-CV-177 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 21, 2012)