Dame v. Dame

Full title: Pamela C. DAME, Appellant, v. Kevin N. DAME, Respondent.

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.

Date published: Dec 10, 2019

590 S.W.3d 891 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

No. ED 107686

12-10-2019

Pamela C. DAME, Appellant, v. Kevin N. DAME, Respondent.

Justin W. Ruth, 7700 Bonhomme Ave., 7 Floor, Clayton, MO 63105, for appellant. John P. Winning, 16690 Swingley Ridge Road, Suite 240, Chesterfield, MO 63017, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Justin W. Ruth, 7700 Bonhomme Ave., 7^th Floor, Clayton, MO 63105, for appellant.

John P. Winning, 16690 Swingley Ridge Road, Suite 240, Chesterfield, MO 63017, for respondent.

Before James M. Dowd, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner Jr., J., and Robin Ransom, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Pamela Dame appeals the trial court’s denial of her Rule 74.06(b)(4) motion seeking to set aside the judgment dissolving her marriage to Kevin Dame. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude no reversible error occurred. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2019).