From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Damaska v. Kandemir

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 13, 2003
1 A.D.3d 159 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

1497

November 13, 2003.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter Tolub, J.), entered December 30, 2002, which, inter alia, denied, with leave to renew upon completion of discovery, defendants' motion insofar as it sought to dismiss plaintiff's third cause of action against defendant Jennifer Kandemir, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Perry Ian Tischler, for plaintiff-respondent.

Jacob Laufer, for defendant-appellant.

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Williams, Friedman, JJ.


Defendants' pre-discovery motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211 was properly denied as to plaintiff's third cause of action, which seeks to impose liability upon defendant-appellant Jennifer Kandemir and defendant Advanced Derma Tech, a limited liability company allegedly co-owned and operated by Jennifer Kandemir and her husband defendant Selcuk Kandemir, for his alleged tortious conduct while rendering treatment to plaintiff, a client of the company.

Although the record indicates that Advanced Derma Tech is a limited liability company, which would generally preclude liability against Jennifer Kandemir (see Limited Liability Company Law § 609[a]), at this pre-discovery stage, it cannot be determined whether Jennifer Kandemir's role in the closely held company and/or her knowledge or conduct with regard to the incidents of sexual harassment and abuse in question might nevertheless result in liability. Discovery must be completed before such determination is made.

The Decision and Order of this Court entered herein on June 24, 2003 is hereby recalled and vacated (see M-3172 decided simultaneously herewith).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Damaska v. Kandemir

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 13, 2003
1 A.D.3d 159 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Damaska v. Kandemir

Case Details

Full title:JILL DAMASKA, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. SELCUK KANDEMIR, ETC., ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 13, 2003

Citations

1 A.D.3d 159 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
767 N.Y.S.2d 569

Citing Cases

Diaz v. Brooks Shopping Ctrs.

Moreover, the Merchant defendants were minority members of the LLC that is the sole member of Brooks and were…

Diaz v. Brooks Shopping Ctr.

Moreover, the Merchant defendants were minority members of the LLC that is the sole member of Brooks and were…