From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

D'Amario v. Jensen

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Dec 15, 2005
No. CV 05-99-TUC-CKJ (D. Ariz. Dec. 15, 2005)

Opinion

No. CV 05-99-TUC-CKJ.

December 15, 2005


ORDER


Pending before the Court is Petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration. For the reasons stated below, the Motion is denied in part and granted in part.

As a threshold matter, this case was dismissed with prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. The Court only intended to dismiss the case (without prejudice), but inadvertently and incorrectly added "with prejudice" to the dismissal. Petitioner has made a valid request to correct this portion of the judgment. As such, pursuant to FED.R.CIV.P. 60(a) which allows for the correction of "clerical mistakes . . . arising from oversight or omission"," IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgment is corrected such that this case is dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall change the judgment accordingly.

Petitioner also requests that the Court consider the merits of this case as he filed a motion for summary judgment. However, as previously explained, as the Court does not have jurisdiction over this case, that motion is moot and it would be improper for the Court to rule on a motion in a case where the Court lacks jurisdiction. Thus, Petitioner's request is denied.


Summaries of

D'Amario v. Jensen

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Dec 15, 2005
No. CV 05-99-TUC-CKJ (D. Ariz. Dec. 15, 2005)
Case details for

D'Amario v. Jensen

Case Details

Full title:Arthur D'Amario, III, Petitioner, v. Magdeline Jensen, Chief U.S…

Court:United States District Court, D. Arizona

Date published: Dec 15, 2005

Citations

No. CV 05-99-TUC-CKJ (D. Ariz. Dec. 15, 2005)