From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dalton v. Brown

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit
Dec 21, 2007
973 So. 2d 180 (La. Ct. App. 2007)

Opinion

No. 2007 CA 0850.

December 21, 2007.

APPEALED FROM THE 19TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE, LOUISIANA CASE NO. 491,102 THE HONORABLE WILLIAM A. MORVANT, JUDGE PRESIDING.

Jerome Joseph Harris, Otha Curtis Nelson, Sr., Baton Rouge, Louisiana, Counsel for Plaintiff/Appellant, Jonathan Dalton.

Dora M. Abadie, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, Counsel for Defendants/Appellees, Willie Brown Gladys K. Brown, and Continental Insurance Company.

Brad J. Brumfield, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, Counsel for Defendant Appellee, Continental Insurance Company.

Jamie M. Bankston, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, Counsel for Defendant/Appellee, Kelvin Brown, Sr. and GEICO, General Insurance Company.

BEFORE: GAIDRY, McDONALD, and McCLENDON, JJ.


SUMMARY DISPOSITION

This is an action for damages for personal injury arising from a motor vehicle accident of January 5, 2001, in East Baton Rouge Parish. The plaintiff, Jonathan Dalton, was a passenger in an automobile operated by Kelvin Brown, Jr. and owned by his grandparents and legal guardians, Willie Brown and Gladys K. Brown (the Browns). The plaintiff's, Ernest L. Dalton and Wanda Dalton, initiated this action seeking damages individually and on behalf of their son Jonathan, then a minor. Through their original and supplemental petitions, they named as defendants the Browns; the Browns' liability and underinsured motorists (UIM) insurer, Continental Insurance Company (Continental); Kelvin Brown, Sr. and Sandra Brown, the biological parents of Kelvin Brown, Jr.; GEICO General Insurance Company, Kelvin Brown, Sr.'s liability insurer; and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm), in its dual capacities as Sandra Brown's liability insurer and the plaintiff's' own UIM insurer. The plaintiff's asserted alternate liability and UIM claims, based upon the fault of either Kelvin Brown, Jr. or the other involved driver, with whom the plaintiff's had compromised prior to instituting this litigation. The plaintiff, Jonathan Dalton, appeals an adverse judgment dismissing all claims against all defendants on the grounds that the plaintiff's failed to prove the negligence of Kelvin Brown, Jr. and the underinsured status of the other driver.

The plaintiff initially contends that the trial court committed error in permitting the investigating State Police trooper to give lay opinion testimony on the speed of the vehicle operated by Kelvin Brown, Jr. and whether he committed any violations of motor vehicle statutes. We conclude that any lay opinion testimony was based upon the trooper's rational perceptions of the facts and physical evidence, and that the trial court did not accord such opinions any undue weight. See State v. LeBlanc, 05-0885, pp. 8-9 (La.App. 1st Cir. 2/10/06), 928 So.2d 599, 603-4.

The issue of the respective negligence of Kelvin Brown, Jr., the other driver, or both was a fact issue, resolved by the trial court adversely to the plaintiff's based upon an express credibility determination. Based upon our review of the record, we find no manifest error in that determination.

The defendants' answers, combined with the trial stipulation regarding the plaintiff's' settlement with the other driver and her liability insurer, sufficiently established the amount of that insurer's liability coverage limits. However, the plaintiff's failed to adequately establish the other driver's underinsured status based upon the absence of any other available liability coverage, sufficient to either shift the burden of proof to the UIM insurers or to prove entitlement to recovery under those coverages. See, e.g., Cabral v. Nat'l Fire Ins. Co., 563 So.2d 533, 536 (La.App. 5th Cir.), writ denied, 567 So.2d 1129 (La. 1990); Leday v. Safeway Ins. Co. of La., 04-610, p. 8 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 11/17/04), 888 So.2d 1084, 1090.

We affirm the judgment of the trial court through this summary disposition, in accordance with Rules 2-16.2(A)(4), (5), (6), (7), and (8) of the Uniform Rules of the Louisiana Courts of Appeal. All costs of this appeal are assessed to the plaintiff-appellant, Jonathan Dalton.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Dalton v. Brown

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit
Dec 21, 2007
973 So. 2d 180 (La. Ct. App. 2007)
Case details for

Dalton v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:Dalton v. Brown

Court:Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit

Date published: Dec 21, 2007

Citations

973 So. 2d 180 (La. Ct. App. 2007)