From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dalrymple Gravel Contracting v. State of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 14, 1967
225 N.E.2d 210 (N.Y. 1967)

Opinion

Argued January 16, 1967

Decided February 14, 1967

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, RICHARD S. HELLER, J.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General ( Jeremiah Jochnowitz and Ruth Kessler Toch of counsel), for appellant.

Alex T. LaBrecque for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum. In Buffalo Elec. Co. v. State of New York ( 14 N.Y.2d 453) and Brandt Corp. v. City of New York ( 14 N.Y.2d 217, 220) we held that when a claimant accepted final payment from the State or city pursuant to its contract "it could not thereafter assert claims for additional sums which it had attempted to reserve" upon acceptance. This in no way conflicts with our holding in this case where the only issue is whether any valid acceptance was made. We conclude that there was sufficient evidence to support the affirmed finding below that no acceptance was ever effected.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, KEATING and BREITEL.


Summaries of

Dalrymple Gravel Contracting v. State of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 14, 1967
225 N.E.2d 210 (N.Y. 1967)
Case details for

Dalrymple Gravel Contracting v. State of New York

Case Details

Full title:DALRYMPLE GRAVEL CONTRACTING Co., INC., Respondent, v. STATE OF NEW YORK…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 14, 1967

Citations

225 N.E.2d 210 (N.Y. 1967)
225 N.E.2d 210
278 N.Y.S.2d 616

Citing Cases

Cayuga Constr. v. City of N.Y

Plaintiff relies mainly on a case wherein claimant was permitted to pursue its claim although the State of…

Silverite Construction Co. v. Facilities Development Corp.

In our view, defendant has raised sufficient questions of fact to defeat plaintiff's motion (see, Zuckerman…