From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dalphines Chidiebere v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Jul 25, 2024
No. 02-23-00286-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 25, 2024)

Opinion

02-23-00286-CR

07-25-2024

Dalphines Chidiebere, Appellant v. The State of Texas


Do Not Publish Tex.R.App.P. 47.2(b)

On Appeal from Criminal District Court No. 1 Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 1747260

Before Kerr, Birdwell, and Wallach, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Mike Wallach Justice

Appellant Dalphines Chidiebere pled guilty without a plea bargain to two counts of indecency with a child by contact. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 21.11(a)(1), (c), (d). After ordering and reviewing a presentence investigation report, the trial court convicted Chidiebere of both second-degree felonies; sentenced him to five years' confinement on each, well within the punishment range; and ordered that the sentences run concurrently. See id. §§ 3.03(b)(2)(a), 12.33(a), 21.11(d). Chidiebere timely appealed.

Chidiebere's appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief complying with Anders v. California, representing that the appeal is frivolous. 386 U.S. 738, 744-45, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 1400 (1967). Counsel's brief and motion meet the requirements of Anders by presenting a professional evaluation of the record and by demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds for relief. See id.; In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403, 406-12 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) (orig. proceeding). This court gave Chidiebere the opportunity to file a pro se response to the Anders brief, but he did not do so; likewise, the State did not file a brief.

After an appellant's court-appointed attorney files a motion to withdraw on the ground that an appeal is frivolous and fulfills the requirements of Anders, we must independently examine the record for any arguable ground that may be raised on the appellant's behalf. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).

Only then may we grant counsel's motion to withdraw. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82-83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 351 (1988).

We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel's brief. We agree with counsel that this appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit; we find nothing in the record before us that arguably might support the appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827-28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see also Meza v. State, 206 S.W.3d 684, 685 n.6 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). We therefore grant counsel's motion to withdraw and affirm the trial court's judgments.


Summaries of

Dalphines Chidiebere v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Jul 25, 2024
No. 02-23-00286-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 25, 2024)
Case details for

Dalphines Chidiebere v. State

Case Details

Full title:Dalphines Chidiebere, Appellant v. The State of Texas

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth

Date published: Jul 25, 2024

Citations

No. 02-23-00286-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 25, 2024)