From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dallio v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 28, 2006
35 A.D.3d 1145 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

No. 99633.

December 28, 2006.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Franklin County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Thomas Dallio, Malone, petitioner pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (Nancy A. Spiegel of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Carpinello, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ.


Petitioner was found guilty following a tier III disciplinary hearing of engaging in violent conduct, harassment and making threats. After the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging it.

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record. Inasmuch as petitioner has been granted all the relief to which he is entitled and is no longer aggrieved, the matter must be dismissed as moot ( see Matter of Chaney v Selsky, 20 AD3d 802).

Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.


Summaries of

Dallio v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 28, 2006
35 A.D.3d 1145 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

Dallio v. Selsky

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of THOMAS DALLIO, Petitioner, v. DONALD SELSKY, as Director…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 28, 2006

Citations

35 A.D.3d 1145 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 9994
825 N.Y.S.2d 386