From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dalke v. Sacramento Corrs.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 18, 2022
2:22-cv-1842 DAD AC P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 18, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-1842 DAD AC P

11-18-2022

JOSHUA DALKE, Plaintiff, v. SACRAMENTO CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

By findings and recommendations filed October 28, 2022, the undersigned recommended that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis be denied because plaintiff made an inadequate showing of indigency. ECF No. 9. Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, has now filed a motion for a ninety-day extension of time to pay the filing fee. ECF No. 10. Because the findings and recommendations have not yet been adopted, the filing fee is not yet due, and plaintiff's motion will be denied. Plaintiff will instead be given an extension of time to file objections to the findings and recommendations. If plaintiff seeks to object to the findings and recommendations on the ground that he is indigent, he must provide an updated trust account statement indicating his lack of funds.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to pay the filing fee (ECF No. 10) is DENIED as unnecessary; and

2. Plaintiff shall have fourteen days from the service of this order to file any objections to the October 28, 2022 findings and recommendations.


Summaries of

Dalke v. Sacramento Corrs.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 18, 2022
2:22-cv-1842 DAD AC P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 18, 2022)
Case details for

Dalke v. Sacramento Corrs.

Case Details

Full title:JOSHUA DALKE, Plaintiff, v. SACRAMENTO CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 18, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-1842 DAD AC P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 18, 2022)