From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daley v. Sears, Roebuck Company

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Apr 20, 1950
182 F.2d 347 (6th Cir. 1950)

Opinion

No. 11067.

April 20, 1950.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio; Paul Jones, Judge.

Sindell Sindell, Jack G. Day, Cleveland, Ohio, for appellant.

Thompson, Hine Flory, Thomas E. Lipscomb, Cleveland, Ohio, for appellee.

Before ALLEN, McALLISTER and MILLER, Circuit Judges.


This cause was heard upon the record, briefs and argument of counsel;

And the Court being of the opinion that the ruling is controlled by Steinbeck v. John Hauck Brewing Co., 7 Ohio App. 18 and Turoff v. Richmond, 76 Ohio App. 83, 61 N.E.2d 486. See also: Den Braven v. Public Service Electric Gas Co., 115 N.J.L. 543, 181 A. 46; Abar v. Ramsey Motor Service, 195 Minn. 597, 263 N.W. 917; Bennett v. McGoldrick-Sanderson Co., 15 Wn.2d 130, 142-144, 129 P.2d 795.

On the authority of said cases and for the reasons stated by the District Judge in his Memorandum Opinion, it is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be affirmed. 90 F. Supp. 561.


Summaries of

Daley v. Sears, Roebuck Company

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Apr 20, 1950
182 F.2d 347 (6th Cir. 1950)
Case details for

Daley v. Sears, Roebuck Company

Case Details

Full title:George T. DALEY, Appellant, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK COMPANY, Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Apr 20, 1950

Citations

182 F.2d 347 (6th Cir. 1950)