Daley v. Micieli

1 Citing case

  1. Wright v. Smith

    CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-0775-JWD-RLB (M.D. La. Jan. 23, 2015)

    Inasmuch as the La. R.S. 15:1172(E) provides that the limitations period is "suspended until the final agency decision is delivered" (emphasis added), it appears that the latter date is appropriate for use by the Court in calculating the recommencement of the limitations period. See also Harris v. Hegmann, supra, 198 F.3d at 160 (noting that an inmate's claim was timely when filed "within one year after [the inmate] received final notice that his administrative complaint was dismissed" (emphasis added); Daley v. Micieli, 2013 WL 5516467, *3 (W. D. La. oct. 2, 2013) (concluding that an inmate's administrative remedies "were not exhausted until he received his final reply denying relief"). Notwithstanding the foregoing, a different calculation applies in connection with the plaintiff's claims regarding the events of June 30, 2012.