Opinion
No. 10-7294.
Submitted: November 18, 2010.
Decided: December 2, 2010.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District Judge. (2:09-cv-00624-MSD-DEM).
Rohaji D. Dale, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa H. Leiner, Harman, Claytor, Corrigan Wellman, Richmond, Virginia; Richard Carson Vorhis, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Jeff W. Rosen, Pender Coward, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia; Lloyd Lee Byrd, Ruth Griggs, Sands Anderson, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Rohaji Dale appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dale v. Forsythe, No. 2:09-cv-00624-MSD-DEM (E.D.Va. Aug. 17, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.