From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dalbotten v. C.R. Bard, Inc.

United States District Court, District of Montana
Feb 2, 2023
1:20-cv-00034-SPW (D. Mont. Feb. 2, 2023)

Opinion

1:20-cv-00034-SPW

02-02-2023

MARIA DALBOTTEN, Plaintiff, v. C. R. BARD, INC. and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC., Defendants.


ORDER

SUSAN P. WATTERS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE.

The parties have filed responses (Docs. 285 and 286) to the Court's Order regarding the Joint Proposed (Juror) Questionnaire (Doc. 281). Neither party suggests any additional case specific questions; however, Plaintiff objects to the inclusion of Questions 33 and 34 which reference the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”). The court disagrees that Questions 33 and 34 suggest third-party conduct. Given the nature of this case, it is important to know the information sought in Questions 33 and 34. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs objection to Questions 33 and 34 are OVERRULED.


Summaries of

Dalbotten v. C.R. Bard, Inc.

United States District Court, District of Montana
Feb 2, 2023
1:20-cv-00034-SPW (D. Mont. Feb. 2, 2023)
Case details for

Dalbotten v. C.R. Bard, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MARIA DALBOTTEN, Plaintiff, v. C. R. BARD, INC. and BARD PERIPHERAL…

Court:United States District Court, District of Montana

Date published: Feb 2, 2023

Citations

1:20-cv-00034-SPW (D. Mont. Feb. 2, 2023)