Opinion
2020-1513
11-10-2020
DAK AMERICAS LLC, AURIGA POLYMERS INC., Plaintiffs-Appellants v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee
PAUL C. ROSENTHAL, Kelley Drye & Warren, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. Also represented by CAMERON R. ARGETSINGER, JOSHUA MOREY, DAVID C. SMITH, JR. MIKKI COTTET, Appellate Staff, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by JEFFREY B. CLARK, JEANNE DAVIDSON, FRANKLIN E. WHITE, JR.; SUZANNA HARTZELL-BALLARD, Office of Assistant Chief Counsel, United States Customs and Border Protection, Indianapolis, IN.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Court of International Trade in No. 1:17-cv-00195-TCS, Chief Judge Timothy C. Stanceu. PAUL C. ROSENTHAL, Kelley Drye & Warren, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. Also represented by CAMERON R. ARGETSINGER, JOSHUA MOREY, DAVID C. SMITH, JR. MIKKI COTTET, Appellate Staff, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by JEFFREY B. CLARK, JEANNE DAVIDSON, FRANKLIN E. WHITE, JR.; SUZANNA HARTZELL-BALLARD, Office of Assistant Chief Counsel, United States Customs and Border Protection, Indianapolis, IN. Before DYK, TARANTO, and STOLL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.
Without reaching the question whether the demand letters at issue here constitute final agency action, the Court finds that appellants have failed to show that, on the merits, the decision by the Court of International Trade was erroneous.