From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daitch v. State

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Jul 10, 2013
No. 05-12-01485-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 10, 2013)

Opinion

No. 05-12-01485-CR

07-10-2013

LOUIS HANCOCK DAITCH, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F04-44009-J


ORDER

Appellant has informed the Court that he wishes to file a pro se response to the Anders brief filed by appellate counsel. Although counsel's motion to withdraw reflects that appellant was provided a copy of the record, appellant's request seeks to obtain copies of the record in order to prepare his pro se response. The address for appellant contained in counsel's motion to withdraw is for a different facility than the one on appellant's request for the record, and the Court cannot determine whether appellant actually received the record counsel indicated was sent to him.

Accordingly, we ORDER appellate counsel Riann Moore to provide appellant with copies of the clerk's and reporter's records. We further ORDER Ms. Moore to provide this Court, within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order, with written verification that the record has been sent to appellant.

Appellant's pro se response is due by SEPTEMBER 20, 2013.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send a copy of this order, by electronic transmission, to Riann Moore, Dallas County Public Defender's Office.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send a copy of this order, by first-class mail, to Louis Daitch, TDCJ No. 1819611, Byrd Unit, 21 F.M. 247, Huntsville, Texas 77320.

DAVID EVANS

JUSTICE


Summaries of

Daitch v. State

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Jul 10, 2013
No. 05-12-01485-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 10, 2013)
Case details for

Daitch v. State

Case Details

Full title:LOUIS HANCOCK DAITCH, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Jul 10, 2013

Citations

No. 05-12-01485-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 10, 2013)