From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dais v. Rodriguez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 29, 2013
12-CV-0184A (W.D.N.Y. Mar. 29, 2013)

Opinion

12-CV-0184A

03-29-2013

WILLIE DAIS, Plaintiff, v. POLICE OFFICER OMAR RODRIGUEZ, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

By Order dated January 2, 2013, Plaintiff was directed to provide the Court with an address at which to serve papers by February 5, 2013 or the case would be dismissed. Plaintiff was further advised that Local Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(d), which governs pro se actions, states: "The Court must have a current address at all times. Thus, a pro se litigant must inform the Court immediately, in writing, of any change of address. Failure to do so may result in dismissal of the case, with prejudice."

Plaintiff has failed to respond to the Court's Order directing that he provide an address. Accordingly, plaintiff's complaint is hereby dismissed with prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

MICHAEL A. TELESCA

United States District Judge
Dated: March 28, 2013

Rochester, New York


Summaries of

Dais v. Rodriguez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 29, 2013
12-CV-0184A (W.D.N.Y. Mar. 29, 2013)
Case details for

Dais v. Rodriguez

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE DAIS, Plaintiff, v. POLICE OFFICER OMAR RODRIGUEZ, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Mar 29, 2013

Citations

12-CV-0184A (W.D.N.Y. Mar. 29, 2013)