From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dairyland Ins. Co. v. General Acc. Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama
Jul 29, 1983
435 So. 2d 1263 (Ala. 1983)

Summary

In Dairyland v. General Accident Insurance Co., 435 So.2d 1263 (Ala. 1983), the insured gave her daughter permission to drive her car.

Summary of this case from Omaha Property Cas. Ins. v. Johnson

Opinion

82-296.

July 29, 1983.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Colbert County, Inge Johnson, J.

William C. Wood of Norman, Fitzpatrick Wood, Birmingham, for appellant.

Steve A. Baccus of Almon, McAlister, Ashe, Baccus Smith, Tuscumbia, for appellee.


This case is affirmed under the ore tenus rule. See Tubbs v. Brandon, 374 So.2d 1358 (Ala. 1979).

On March 9, 1980, Jerome Campbell rode in an automobile driven by his fiance Sandra Warren to visit her relatives. Jerome was in considerable pain from a toothache. Sandra gave the keys to the car to Jerome with her permission to drive the car to a drug store, and then to his apartment. While he was driving the car Jerome collided with a vehicle occupied by Henry and Ethel Chaney.

The Chaneys filed suit against Jerome for negligence and wantonness, and against Mildred Warren (the owner of the car driven by Jerome) and Sandra, alleging negligent entrustment.

On September 21, 1981, (1) a consent judgment was entered in favor of Mildred Warren and Sandra Warren; (2) consent judgments were entered against Jerome Campbell in favor of Henry Chaney for $12,000.00, and in favor of Ethel Chaney for $500.00. The judgments were paid by Dairyland and General Accident. Each paid one-half of the judgments.

Following the consent judgments, Dairyland sued General Accident, seeking damages and a determination of whether Jerome Campbell was insured under an insurance policy issued by General Accident to Mildred Warren, the owner of the car driven by Jerome at the time of the accident.

The General Accident policy contained the following exclusion:

"A. We do not provide liability coverage for any person. . .

"8. Using a vehicle without a reasonable belief that that person is entitled to do so."

The evidence shows that Mildred Warren owned the car; that Sandra, her daughter, was the only person given permission by her to drive the car; that Jerome Campbell knew that only Sandra had permission to drive the car; that he knew that Mildred Warren did not want him to drive the car at any time; and that he knew Sandra did not have authority to permit him to drive the car.

The trial court found that Jerome Campbell was a person who came within the policy exclusion. After a review of the evidence, we hold that the trial judge was correct in her judgment.

AFFIRMED.

TORBERT, C.J., and ALMON, EMBRY and ADAMS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dairyland Ins. Co. v. General Acc. Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama
Jul 29, 1983
435 So. 2d 1263 (Ala. 1983)

In Dairyland v. General Accident Insurance Co., 435 So.2d 1263 (Ala. 1983), the insured gave her daughter permission to drive her car.

Summary of this case from Omaha Property Cas. Ins. v. Johnson

In Dairyland v. General Accident Insurance Co., 435 So.2d 1263 (Ala. 1983), the insured gave her daughter permission to drive her car.

Summary of this case from General Accident v. Perry
Case details for

Dairyland Ins. Co. v. General Acc. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:DAIRYLAND INSURANCE COMPANY v. GENERAL ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Jul 29, 1983

Citations

435 So. 2d 1263 (Ala. 1983)

Citing Cases

General Accident v. Perry

Of those cases, two upheld the validity of the insurer's exclusion, one reversed a lower court's judgment…

Cooper v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

In most of these decisions, the driver's legal right to drive was not in question, and the possessory right…