From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dairyland Ins. Co. v. Cobbs

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Dec 7, 1999
8 S.W.3d 191 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. ED75607.

December 7, 1999.

APPEAL FROM: CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS, HONORABLE PATRICIA L. COHEN.

Gordon W. Neilson, Lawrence Willbrand, St. Louis, for appellant.

The Hullverson Law Firm, Stephen H. Ringkamp, Scott L. Kolker, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before GARY M. GAERTNER, P.J., PAUL J. SIMON, J., and JAMES R. DOWD, J.


ORDER


In this appeal from an interpleader action, appellant, Gordon Neilson, claims that the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis erred in finding that he did not establish an attorney/client relationship with the respondent, Tarron Cobbs. We affirm.

Tarron Cobbs' motions to dismiss and for sanctions for frivolous appeal, taken with the case, are denied.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcripts, and find the judgment is not clearly erroneous. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.


Summaries of

Dairyland Ins. Co. v. Cobbs

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Dec 7, 1999
8 S.W.3d 191 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Dairyland Ins. Co. v. Cobbs

Case Details

Full title:DAIRYLAND INSURANCE COMPANY, PLAINTIFF, v. TARRON COBBS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Dec 7, 1999

Citations

8 S.W.3d 191 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)

Citing Cases

Neilson v. McCloskey

We note that this body of law is well known to Neilson and his counsel. See Dairyland Ins. v. Cobbs, 8 S.W.3d…