From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dailey v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Dec 19, 2000
41 S.W.3d 494 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. ED77952

Filed: December 19, 2000 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied February 22, 2001. Application to Transfer Denied April 24, 2001.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS CITY, HONORABLE JULIAN BUSH.

Stephen Harris, Mark Allen Grothoff, 3402 Buttonwood, Columbia, Missouri 65201, for Appellant.

John Munson Morris III, Supreme Court Building, P.O. Box 899 Jefferson City, Missouri 65102, for Respondent.

Before: Gary M. Gaertner, P.J., Lawrence G. Crahan, J., and George W. Draper, III, J.



ORDER

Kenneth Dailey appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without a hearing in that his appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to raise various claims on appeal.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcripts and find the motion's court decision was not clearly erroneous because trial counsel's failure to object constituted trial strategy. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Dailey v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Dec 19, 2000
41 S.W.3d 494 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Dailey v. State

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH DAILEY, Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: Dec 19, 2000

Citations

41 S.W.3d 494 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)