From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dailey v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 31, 2016
Case No. EDCV 16-0019 AG (SS) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 31, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. EDCV 16-0019 AG (SS)

03-31-2016

JAMES DAILEY, Petitioner, v. SMITH, Acting Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all the records and files herein, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and Petitioner's Objections. After having made a de novo determination of the portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Objections were directed, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. \\ \\ \\ \\ \\

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition is denied and Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action without prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order and the Judgment herein on Petitioner at his address of record.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. DATED: March 31, 2016

/s/_________

ANDREW J. GUILFORD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Dailey v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 31, 2016
Case No. EDCV 16-0019 AG (SS) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 31, 2016)
Case details for

Dailey v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:JAMES DAILEY, Petitioner, v. SMITH, Acting Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 31, 2016

Citations

Case No. EDCV 16-0019 AG (SS) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 31, 2016)