From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dailey v. Guzman

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 30, 2021
1:21-cv-01502-DAD-EPG (E.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2021)

Opinion

1:21-cv-01502-DAD-EPG

11-30-2021

JESSICA DAILEY, et al. Plaintiffs v. HORACIO GUZMAN, et al. Defendants


APPLICATION FOR PRO HAC VICE AND PROPOSED ORDER

Pursuant to Local Rule 180(b)(2) of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Richard J. Pearl hereby applies for permission to appear and participate as counsel in the above entitled action on behalf of the following party or parties:

James Urbach ___ On November 8, 2001(date), I was admitted to practice and presently in good standing in the State of Illinois(court). A certificate of good standing from that court is submitted in conjunction with this application. I have not been disbarred or formally censured by a court of record or by a state bar association; and there are not disciplinary proceedings against me.

[ ] I have / [X] I have not concurrently or within the year preceding this application made a pro hac vice application to this court. (If you have made a pro hac vice application to this court within the last year, list the name and case No. of each matter in which an application was made, the date of application and whether granted or denied.)

ORDER

The Pro Hac Vice Application is APPROVED. The Pro Hac Vice Attorney is DIRECTED to request filing access through PACER.


Summaries of

Dailey v. Guzman

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 30, 2021
1:21-cv-01502-DAD-EPG (E.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2021)
Case details for

Dailey v. Guzman

Case Details

Full title:JESSICA DAILEY, et al. Plaintiffs v. HORACIO GUZMAN, et al. Defendants

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 30, 2021

Citations

1:21-cv-01502-DAD-EPG (E.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2021)